Review



working memory accuracy (one card back)  (CogState Ltd)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    CogState Ltd working memory accuracy (one card back)
    Demographic characteristics and outcomes at intake.
    Working Memory Accuracy (One Card Back), supplied by CogState Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/accuracy+in+one-back+card+memory/pmc08593952-69-0-0?v=CogState+Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    working memory accuracy (one card back) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Health-Related Quality of Life: Longitudinal Analysis From the Time of Breast Biopsy Into the Post-treatment Period"

    Article Title: Health-Related Quality of Life: Longitudinal Analysis From the Time of Breast Biopsy Into the Post-treatment Period

    Journal: Frontiers in Global Women's Health

    doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.608787

    Demographic characteristics and outcomes at intake.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Demographic characteristics and outcomes at intake.

    Techniques Used: Comparison

    CogState computerized cognitive ability test score box plots for the benign (breast lump autopsy), no-chemo (treatment for breast cancer), and chemo (treatment for breast cancer) groups. Higher scores mean better cognitive performance on the battery of tests with playing cards. Box plots are presented for card detection accuracy, card identification accuracy, one-back card memory accuracy, card monitoring (prior card recognition learning) accuracy, card paired-associate learning accuracy, continuous paired-associate learning accuracy (CPAL), and card presentation pattern prediction accuracy. The SE value for each group is capped above its bar.
    Figure Legend Snippet: CogState computerized cognitive ability test score box plots for the benign (breast lump autopsy), no-chemo (treatment for breast cancer), and chemo (treatment for breast cancer) groups. Higher scores mean better cognitive performance on the battery of tests with playing cards. Box plots are presented for card detection accuracy, card identification accuracy, one-back card memory accuracy, card monitoring (prior card recognition learning) accuracy, card paired-associate learning accuracy, continuous paired-associate learning accuracy (CPAL), and card presentation pattern prediction accuracy. The SE value for each group is capped above its bar.

    Techniques Used: Battery

    Least square (adjusted) means and SE of outcomes at 4 months and 1 year adjusted for intake, age, education, and income.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Least square (adjusted) means and SE of outcomes at 4 months and 1 year adjusted for intake, age, education, and income.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    working memory accuracy (one card back)  (CogState Ltd)
    90
    CogState Ltd working memory accuracy (one card back)
    Demographic characteristics and outcomes at intake.
    Working Memory Accuracy (One Card Back), supplied by CogState Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/accuracy+in+one-back+card+memory/pmc08593952-69-0-0?v=CogState+Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    working memory accuracy (one card back) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    one-back card memory accuracy  (CogState Ltd)
    90
    CogState Ltd one-back card memory accuracy
    Severe malaria survivors Demographic characteristics and outcomes at baseline by trial arm (N=150 total).
    One Back Card Memory Accuracy, supplied by CogState Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/accuracy+in+one-back+card+memory/pmc06127009-95-1-0?v=CogState+Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    one-back card memory accuracy - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    accuracy in one-back card memory  (CogState Ltd)
    90
    CogState Ltd accuracy in one-back card memory
    Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline
    Accuracy In One Back Card Memory, supplied by CogState Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/accuracy+in+one-back+card+memory/pmc04971428-114-3-0?v=CogState+Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    accuracy in one-back card memory - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cogstate, accuracy in one-back card memory  (CogState Ltd)
    90
    CogState Ltd cogstate, accuracy in one-back card memory
    Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline
    Cogstate, Accuracy In One Back Card Memory, supplied by CogState Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/accuracy+in+one-back+card+memory/pmc04971428-414-330-327?v=CogState+Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cogstate, accuracy in one-back card memory - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Demographic characteristics and outcomes at intake.

    Journal: Frontiers in Global Women's Health

    Article Title: Health-Related Quality of Life: Longitudinal Analysis From the Time of Breast Biopsy Into the Post-treatment Period

    doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.608787

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Demographic characteristics and outcomes at intake.

    Article Snippet: CogState working memory accuracy (one card back) , , , , .

    Techniques: Comparison

    CogState computerized cognitive ability test score box plots for the benign (breast lump autopsy), no-chemo (treatment for breast cancer), and chemo (treatment for breast cancer) groups. Higher scores mean better cognitive performance on the battery of tests with playing cards. Box plots are presented for card detection accuracy, card identification accuracy, one-back card memory accuracy, card monitoring (prior card recognition learning) accuracy, card paired-associate learning accuracy, continuous paired-associate learning accuracy (CPAL), and card presentation pattern prediction accuracy. The SE value for each group is capped above its bar.

    Journal: Frontiers in Global Women's Health

    Article Title: Health-Related Quality of Life: Longitudinal Analysis From the Time of Breast Biopsy Into the Post-treatment Period

    doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.608787

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CogState computerized cognitive ability test score box plots for the benign (breast lump autopsy), no-chemo (treatment for breast cancer), and chemo (treatment for breast cancer) groups. Higher scores mean better cognitive performance on the battery of tests with playing cards. Box plots are presented for card detection accuracy, card identification accuracy, one-back card memory accuracy, card monitoring (prior card recognition learning) accuracy, card paired-associate learning accuracy, continuous paired-associate learning accuracy (CPAL), and card presentation pattern prediction accuracy. The SE value for each group is capped above its bar.

    Article Snippet: CogState working memory accuracy (one card back) , , , , .

    Techniques: Battery

    Least square (adjusted) means and SE of outcomes at 4 months and 1 year adjusted for intake, age, education, and income.

    Journal: Frontiers in Global Women's Health

    Article Title: Health-Related Quality of Life: Longitudinal Analysis From the Time of Breast Biopsy Into the Post-treatment Period

    doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.608787

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Least square (adjusted) means and SE of outcomes at 4 months and 1 year adjusted for intake, age, education, and income.

    Article Snippet: CogState working memory accuracy (one card back) , , , , .

    Techniques:

    Severe malaria survivors Demographic characteristics and outcomes at baseline by trial arm (N=150 total).

    Journal: Brain research bulletin

    Article Title: Neuropsychological Benefits of Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training in Ugandan Children Surviving Severe Malaria: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.03.002

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Severe malaria survivors Demographic characteristics and outcomes at baseline by trial arm (N=150 total).

    Article Snippet: CogState, one-back card memory accuracy , , , , .

    Techniques: Control

    Non-malaria children Demographic characteristics and outcomes at baseline by trial arm (N=150 total).

    Journal: Brain research bulletin

    Article Title: Neuropsychological Benefits of Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training in Ugandan Children Surviving Severe Malaria: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.03.002

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Non-malaria children Demographic characteristics and outcomes at baseline by trial arm (N=150 total).

    Article Snippet: CogState, one-back card memory accuracy , , , , .

    Techniques: Control

    Severe malaria survivors Post-training least square means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by trial arm adjusted for age, sex, weight, height, HOME score, material possessions socio-economic score, and malaria exposure (cerebral versus severe malarial anemia). Least square (LS) means of the outcome variables were obtained from linear mixed effects (LME) models with two repeated measures: (1) immediately after CCRT training (post-training) and (2) 12 months following completion of CCRT training (one year follow-up). Baseline measures of the outcome variables were used as covariates for added control for any pre-intervention influences.

    Journal: Brain research bulletin

    Article Title: Neuropsychological Benefits of Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training in Ugandan Children Surviving Severe Malaria: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.03.002

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Severe malaria survivors Post-training least square means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by trial arm adjusted for age, sex, weight, height, HOME score, material possessions socio-economic score, and malaria exposure (cerebral versus severe malarial anemia). Least square (LS) means of the outcome variables were obtained from linear mixed effects (LME) models with two repeated measures: (1) immediately after CCRT training (post-training) and (2) 12 months following completion of CCRT training (one year follow-up). Baseline measures of the outcome variables were used as covariates for added control for any pre-intervention influences.

    Article Snippet: CogState, one-back card memory accuracy , , , , .

    Techniques: Control, Comparison

    Non-malaria children Post-training least square means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by trial arm adjusted for age, sex, weight, height, HOME score, material possessions socio-economic score, and malaria exposure (cerebral versus severe malarial anemia). Least square (LS) means of the outcome variables were obtained from linear mixed effects (LME) models with two repeated measures: (1) immediately after CCRT training (post-training) and (2) 12 months following completion of CCRT training (one year follow-up). Baseline measures of the outcome variables used as covariates for added control for pre-intervention influences.

    Journal: Brain research bulletin

    Article Title: Neuropsychological Benefits of Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training in Ugandan Children Surviving Severe Malaria: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.03.002

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Non-malaria children Post-training least square means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by trial arm adjusted for age, sex, weight, height, HOME score, material possessions socio-economic score, and malaria exposure (cerebral versus severe malarial anemia). Least square (LS) means of the outcome variables were obtained from linear mixed effects (LME) models with two repeated measures: (1) immediately after CCRT training (post-training) and (2) 12 months following completion of CCRT training (one year follow-up). Baseline measures of the outcome variables used as covariates for added control for pre-intervention influences.

    Article Snippet: CogState, one-back card memory accuracy , , , , .

    Techniques: Control, Comparison

    Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Article Snippet: CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory , 0.39737 , 0.61549 , 0.58064.

    Techniques: Control, Comparison

    KABC and CogState Outcomes of Those on HAART at Intake: Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: KABC and CogState Outcomes of Those on HAART at Intake: Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Article Snippet: CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory , 0.39737 , 0.61549 , 0.58064.

    Techniques: Control, Comparison

    Associations Between Captain's Log Performance Success Composite Measure from the Last Training Session with KABC and CogState, TOVA, BOT-2, BRIEF, and CBCL Outcomes at 2 months

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Associations Between Captain's Log Performance Success Composite Measure from the Last Training Session with KABC and CogState, TOVA, BOT-2, BRIEF, and CBCL Outcomes at 2 months

    Article Snippet: CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory , 0.39737 , 0.61549 , 0.58064.

    Techniques:

    Summary of Longitudinal Models with Group by Biological Measure at Baseline Interaction: Slopes for Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training Versus Control, Their Standard Errors, Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores At Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of Longitudinal Models with Group by Biological Measure at Baseline Interaction: Slopes for Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training Versus Control, Their Standard Errors, Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores At Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Article Snippet: CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory , 0.39737 , 0.61549 , 0.58064.

    Techniques: Control, Activation Assay

    Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Article Snippet: Even the TOVA outcomes, which did not significantly improve from CCRT, were significantly correlated to CLIE for both the CCRT and limited CCRT treatment arms ( ). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 Table 4. caption a7 Neuropsychology outcomes Correlation, p -value, N both CCRT arms combined Correlation, p -value, N CCRT Correlation, p -value, N Limited CCRT KABC-II sequential processing 0.16890 0.28905 0.24716 .0865 .0377 .0773 104 52 52 KABC-II simultaneous processing 0.21027 0.40636 0.31516 .0322 .0028 .0229 104 52 52 KABC-II learning 0.37490 0.46468 0.25711 <.0001 .0005 .0658 104 52 52 KABC-II knowledge 0.14579 0.19680 0.22009 .1398 .1620 .1169 104 52 52 KABC-II planning 0.23646 0.19609 0.19574 .0248 .1865 .2084 90 47 43 KABC-II delayed recall 0.26410 0.29487 0.18437 .0067 .0338 .1907 104 52 52 KABC-II nonverbal index 0.23857 0.47394 0.18239 .0147 .0004 .1956 104 52 52 KABC-II mental processing index 0.29574 0.43314 0.23794 .0023 .0013 .0894 104 52 52 TOVA% omission errors −0.28890 − 0.56424 − 0.44374 .0029 <.0001 .0010 104 52 52 TOVA% commission errors −0.35133 − 0.42219 − 0.47518 .0003 .0018 .0004 104 52 52 TOVA response time −0.31594 − 0.53459 − 0.48492 .0011 <.0001 .0003 104 52 52 TOVA response time variability − 0.47159 − 0.66011 − 0.62921 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA D prime signal detection score 0.45219 0.65211 0.60422 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA ADHD index 0.25659 0.36138 0.23341 .0086 .0085 .0959 104 52 52 BOT-2 total motor score 0.14691 0.27669 0.27980 .1367 .0471 .0445 104 52 52 CogState, maze chase correct moves per second 0.32833 0.40787 0.46928 .0007 .0027 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, maze learning correct moves per second 0.30791 0.48046 0.50062 .0015 .0003 .0002 104 52 52 CogState, detection time: playing card turned −0.20304 −0.38218 −0.38038 .0387 .0052 .0054 104 52 52 CogState, identification time: red playing card turned −0.19251 − 0.48910 −0.33404 .0503 .0002 .0155 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-card learning 0.20128 0.29283 0.47647 .0405 .0351 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory 0.39737 0.61549 0.58064 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 BRIEF behavior regulation index −0.21421 −0.12993 −0.19023 .0392 .3841 .2054 93 47 46 BRIEF metacognition index −0.33242 −0.39218 −0.32614 .0011 .0064 .0270 93 47 46 BRIEF global executive composite index −0.28405 −0.29307 −0.31017 .0058 .0456 .0359 93 47 46 CBCL externalizing total −0.19587 −0.16002 −0.15208 .0463 .2571 .2818 104 52 52 CBCL internalizing total −0.14429 0.02626 −0.02828 .1439 .8534 .8423 104 52 52 CBCL total −0.25922 −0.12003 −0.22522 .0079 .3967 .1084 104 52 52 Open in a separate window Moderate correlations of 0.40 or higher in absolute value are bolded .

    Techniques: Control, Comparison

    KABC and CogState Outcomes of Those on HAART at Intake: Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: KABC and CogState Outcomes of Those on HAART at Intake: Least Square Means from Longitudinal Model, Their Standard Errors by Trial Arm Adjusted for Age, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores at Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Article Snippet: Even the TOVA outcomes, which did not significantly improve from CCRT, were significantly correlated to CLIE for both the CCRT and limited CCRT treatment arms ( ). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 Table 4. caption a7 Neuropsychology outcomes Correlation, p -value, N both CCRT arms combined Correlation, p -value, N CCRT Correlation, p -value, N Limited CCRT KABC-II sequential processing 0.16890 0.28905 0.24716 .0865 .0377 .0773 104 52 52 KABC-II simultaneous processing 0.21027 0.40636 0.31516 .0322 .0028 .0229 104 52 52 KABC-II learning 0.37490 0.46468 0.25711 <.0001 .0005 .0658 104 52 52 KABC-II knowledge 0.14579 0.19680 0.22009 .1398 .1620 .1169 104 52 52 KABC-II planning 0.23646 0.19609 0.19574 .0248 .1865 .2084 90 47 43 KABC-II delayed recall 0.26410 0.29487 0.18437 .0067 .0338 .1907 104 52 52 KABC-II nonverbal index 0.23857 0.47394 0.18239 .0147 .0004 .1956 104 52 52 KABC-II mental processing index 0.29574 0.43314 0.23794 .0023 .0013 .0894 104 52 52 TOVA% omission errors −0.28890 − 0.56424 − 0.44374 .0029 <.0001 .0010 104 52 52 TOVA% commission errors −0.35133 − 0.42219 − 0.47518 .0003 .0018 .0004 104 52 52 TOVA response time −0.31594 − 0.53459 − 0.48492 .0011 <.0001 .0003 104 52 52 TOVA response time variability − 0.47159 − 0.66011 − 0.62921 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA D prime signal detection score 0.45219 0.65211 0.60422 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA ADHD index 0.25659 0.36138 0.23341 .0086 .0085 .0959 104 52 52 BOT-2 total motor score 0.14691 0.27669 0.27980 .1367 .0471 .0445 104 52 52 CogState, maze chase correct moves per second 0.32833 0.40787 0.46928 .0007 .0027 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, maze learning correct moves per second 0.30791 0.48046 0.50062 .0015 .0003 .0002 104 52 52 CogState, detection time: playing card turned −0.20304 −0.38218 −0.38038 .0387 .0052 .0054 104 52 52 CogState, identification time: red playing card turned −0.19251 − 0.48910 −0.33404 .0503 .0002 .0155 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-card learning 0.20128 0.29283 0.47647 .0405 .0351 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory 0.39737 0.61549 0.58064 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 BRIEF behavior regulation index −0.21421 −0.12993 −0.19023 .0392 .3841 .2054 93 47 46 BRIEF metacognition index −0.33242 −0.39218 −0.32614 .0011 .0064 .0270 93 47 46 BRIEF global executive composite index −0.28405 −0.29307 −0.31017 .0058 .0456 .0359 93 47 46 CBCL externalizing total −0.19587 −0.16002 −0.15208 .0463 .2571 .2818 104 52 52 CBCL internalizing total −0.14429 0.02626 −0.02828 .1439 .8534 .8423 104 52 52 CBCL total −0.25922 −0.12003 −0.22522 .0079 .3967 .1084 104 52 52 Open in a separate window Moderate correlations of 0.40 or higher in absolute value are bolded .

    Techniques: Control, Comparison

    Associations Between Captain's Log Performance Success Composite Measure from the Last Training Session with KABC and CogState, TOVA, BOT-2, BRIEF, and CBCL Outcomes at 2 months

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Associations Between Captain's Log Performance Success Composite Measure from the Last Training Session with KABC and CogState, TOVA, BOT-2, BRIEF, and CBCL Outcomes at 2 months

    Article Snippet: Even the TOVA outcomes, which did not significantly improve from CCRT, were significantly correlated to CLIE for both the CCRT and limited CCRT treatment arms ( ). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 Table 4. caption a7 Neuropsychology outcomes Correlation, p -value, N both CCRT arms combined Correlation, p -value, N CCRT Correlation, p -value, N Limited CCRT KABC-II sequential processing 0.16890 0.28905 0.24716 .0865 .0377 .0773 104 52 52 KABC-II simultaneous processing 0.21027 0.40636 0.31516 .0322 .0028 .0229 104 52 52 KABC-II learning 0.37490 0.46468 0.25711 <.0001 .0005 .0658 104 52 52 KABC-II knowledge 0.14579 0.19680 0.22009 .1398 .1620 .1169 104 52 52 KABC-II planning 0.23646 0.19609 0.19574 .0248 .1865 .2084 90 47 43 KABC-II delayed recall 0.26410 0.29487 0.18437 .0067 .0338 .1907 104 52 52 KABC-II nonverbal index 0.23857 0.47394 0.18239 .0147 .0004 .1956 104 52 52 KABC-II mental processing index 0.29574 0.43314 0.23794 .0023 .0013 .0894 104 52 52 TOVA% omission errors −0.28890 − 0.56424 − 0.44374 .0029 <.0001 .0010 104 52 52 TOVA% commission errors −0.35133 − 0.42219 − 0.47518 .0003 .0018 .0004 104 52 52 TOVA response time −0.31594 − 0.53459 − 0.48492 .0011 <.0001 .0003 104 52 52 TOVA response time variability − 0.47159 − 0.66011 − 0.62921 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA D prime signal detection score 0.45219 0.65211 0.60422 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA ADHD index 0.25659 0.36138 0.23341 .0086 .0085 .0959 104 52 52 BOT-2 total motor score 0.14691 0.27669 0.27980 .1367 .0471 .0445 104 52 52 CogState, maze chase correct moves per second 0.32833 0.40787 0.46928 .0007 .0027 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, maze learning correct moves per second 0.30791 0.48046 0.50062 .0015 .0003 .0002 104 52 52 CogState, detection time: playing card turned −0.20304 −0.38218 −0.38038 .0387 .0052 .0054 104 52 52 CogState, identification time: red playing card turned −0.19251 − 0.48910 −0.33404 .0503 .0002 .0155 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-card learning 0.20128 0.29283 0.47647 .0405 .0351 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory 0.39737 0.61549 0.58064 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 BRIEF behavior regulation index −0.21421 −0.12993 −0.19023 .0392 .3841 .2054 93 47 46 BRIEF metacognition index −0.33242 −0.39218 −0.32614 .0011 .0064 .0270 93 47 46 BRIEF global executive composite index −0.28405 −0.29307 −0.31017 .0058 .0456 .0359 93 47 46 CBCL externalizing total −0.19587 −0.16002 −0.15208 .0463 .2571 .2818 104 52 52 CBCL internalizing total −0.14429 0.02626 −0.02828 .1439 .8534 .8423 104 52 52 CBCL total −0.25922 −0.12003 −0.22522 .0079 .3967 .1084 104 52 52 Open in a separate window Moderate correlations of 0.40 or higher in absolute value are bolded .

    Techniques:

    Summary of Longitudinal Models with Group by Biological Measure at Baseline Interaction: Slopes for Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training Versus Control, Their Standard Errors, Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores At Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Journal: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses

    Article Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate if Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Improves Neurocognition in Ugandan Children with HIV

    doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0026

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of Longitudinal Models with Group by Biological Measure at Baseline Interaction: Slopes for Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Training Versus Control, Their Standard Errors, Adjusted for Age, Being on HAART at Intake, Socioeconomic Score, Home Score, Recruitment Location, KABC Learning and Delayed Recall Scores At Baseline, and Outcome Score at Baseline

    Article Snippet: Even the TOVA outcomes, which did not significantly improve from CCRT, were significantly correlated to CLIE for both the CCRT and limited CCRT treatment arms ( ). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 Table 4. caption a7 Neuropsychology outcomes Correlation, p -value, N both CCRT arms combined Correlation, p -value, N CCRT Correlation, p -value, N Limited CCRT KABC-II sequential processing 0.16890 0.28905 0.24716 .0865 .0377 .0773 104 52 52 KABC-II simultaneous processing 0.21027 0.40636 0.31516 .0322 .0028 .0229 104 52 52 KABC-II learning 0.37490 0.46468 0.25711 <.0001 .0005 .0658 104 52 52 KABC-II knowledge 0.14579 0.19680 0.22009 .1398 .1620 .1169 104 52 52 KABC-II planning 0.23646 0.19609 0.19574 .0248 .1865 .2084 90 47 43 KABC-II delayed recall 0.26410 0.29487 0.18437 .0067 .0338 .1907 104 52 52 KABC-II nonverbal index 0.23857 0.47394 0.18239 .0147 .0004 .1956 104 52 52 KABC-II mental processing index 0.29574 0.43314 0.23794 .0023 .0013 .0894 104 52 52 TOVA% omission errors −0.28890 − 0.56424 − 0.44374 .0029 <.0001 .0010 104 52 52 TOVA% commission errors −0.35133 − 0.42219 − 0.47518 .0003 .0018 .0004 104 52 52 TOVA response time −0.31594 − 0.53459 − 0.48492 .0011 <.0001 .0003 104 52 52 TOVA response time variability − 0.47159 − 0.66011 − 0.62921 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA D prime signal detection score 0.45219 0.65211 0.60422 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 TOVA ADHD index 0.25659 0.36138 0.23341 .0086 .0085 .0959 104 52 52 BOT-2 total motor score 0.14691 0.27669 0.27980 .1367 .0471 .0445 104 52 52 CogState, maze chase correct moves per second 0.32833 0.40787 0.46928 .0007 .0027 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, maze learning correct moves per second 0.30791 0.48046 0.50062 .0015 .0003 .0002 104 52 52 CogState, detection time: playing card turned −0.20304 −0.38218 −0.38038 .0387 .0052 .0054 104 52 52 CogState, identification time: red playing card turned −0.19251 − 0.48910 −0.33404 .0503 .0002 .0155 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-card learning 0.20128 0.29283 0.47647 .0405 .0351 .0004 104 52 52 CogState, accuracy in one-back card memory 0.39737 0.61549 0.58064 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 104 52 52 BRIEF behavior regulation index −0.21421 −0.12993 −0.19023 .0392 .3841 .2054 93 47 46 BRIEF metacognition index −0.33242 −0.39218 −0.32614 .0011 .0064 .0270 93 47 46 BRIEF global executive composite index −0.28405 −0.29307 −0.31017 .0058 .0456 .0359 93 47 46 CBCL externalizing total −0.19587 −0.16002 −0.15208 .0463 .2571 .2818 104 52 52 CBCL internalizing total −0.14429 0.02626 −0.02828 .1439 .8534 .8423 104 52 52 CBCL total −0.25922 −0.12003 −0.22522 .0079 .3967 .1084 104 52 52 Open in a separate window Moderate correlations of 0.40 or higher in absolute value are bolded .

    Techniques: Control, Activation Assay